For professional bodies & chartered institutes
Map your profession internationally — with evidence behind every entry.
Where is your discipline taught, accredited and practised worldwide? We build a registry-anchored map of the institutions, providers and members that matter to your body — every record carrying an evidence URL, coverage stated against the authoritative registries you’d cite, and a compliance pack in the box.
A defensible map — not a list
International strategy lives or dies on knowing the full picture. Whether you’re expanding internationally, accrediting overseas programmes and providers, pursuing mutual-recognition agreements, or growing membership in new markets, each rests on the same foundation: a complete, defensible map of where your profession is taught and practised.
A partial list undermines every decision built on top of it. If your council asks “how do we know this is everyone?”, an internal spreadsheet has no answer. A map measured against authoritative registries does.
What we deliver
A registry-anchored frame of the institutions, providers and members in your population — built outward from the authoritative lists your sector recognises (national accreditation registers, regulator registries, recognised-provider lists, course registries). Every frame ships with:
- An evidence URL per entry — each institution traceable to a public, citable source.
- A coverage statement — a number against a denominator, not an adjective.
- Screening to your scope — the right discipline, level, territory, accreditation status, with a recorded reason per record.
- A GDPR compliance pack — defensible to your DPO, your council, and any partner who asks.
Why SampleQuick, not in-house or a generalist consultancy
| In-house | Consultancy | SampleQuick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | Months of staff time | Slow, bespoke | Weeks, productised |
| Evidence | Ad-hoc | A deck, not a dataset | Evidence URL per entry |
| Coverage | “The ones we know of” | Rarely measured | Number vs authoritative denominator |
| Repeatable | One-off, decays | Re-quoted each time | Refreshable on a schedule |
| Compliance | Undocumented | Variable | GDPR pack included |
A consultancy hands you conclusions; we hand you the evidenced population those conclusions should be drawn from — and we tell you, in a number, how complete it is.
“Why not just ask the national accreditor, or use our own list?”
It’s the right question, and the honest answer is: no single registry is complete. National accreditors hold the providers they accredit; a regulator holds the practitioners it registers; your own list holds who you’ve engaged. Each has blind spots — dual-accredited programmes, transnational education, new entrants.
We union the authoritative lists into one de-duplicated population, measure coverage against that union, and pull in what they miss — every addition carrying its own evidence URL. That’s the difference between a list and the map.